The Failure Of The Organizational Sentencing Guidelines
نویسنده
چکیده
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 1. GOALS OF CORPORATE LIABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 A. Corporate Deterrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 B. Using Liability to Induce Corporate Deterrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 2. MITIGATION PROVISIONS FOR COMPLIANCE, SELF-REPORTING, AND COOPERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 A. Structuring Penalities to Encourage Detection, Reporting, and Cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 B. Deficiencies with Guidelines’ Provisions Governing Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . 340 1. STRUCTURE OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL GUIDELINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 2. MITIGATION PROVISIONS GOVERNING SELF-REPORTING AND COOPERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 a. Restrictions on the Scope of Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 b. Inadequate Amount of Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344 3. MITIGATION PROVISIONS GOVERNING EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351 3. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPROACH TO MITIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 4. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
منابع مشابه
Improving Judicial Administration Through Implementation of an Automated Sentencing Guidelines System
To ensure public trust and confidence, courts must routinely examine the management of their operations and continuously explore improvement opportunities. Although technology can be a catalyst for improving judicial administration, without the requisite planning, organizational capital (e.g., people, process, and system alignment), and evaluation it is unlikely that such initiatives will be su...
متن کاملSentencing Guidelines for Copyright Pirates in the United States and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: A Comparative Perspective
As more and more nations prosecute copyright piracy cases, it is far from clear whether these nations, in seeking to protect legitimate copyright interests, will also recognize the need to achieve three goals in the sentencing of such cases. The first is honesty in sentencing: that is, avoiding situations in which the nominal sentence that a court initially imposes at sentencing may later be su...
متن کاملHave Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparities Increased in an Advisory Guidelines Regime? Evidence from Booker
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were promulgated in response to concerns of widespread disparities in sentencing. After almost two decades of determinate sentencing, the Guidelines were rendered advisory in United States v. Booker. How has greater judicial discretion affected interjudge disparities, or differences in sentencing outcomes that are attributable to the mere happenstance of the se...
متن کاملSentencing Commissions and Their Guidelines
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sentencing, were first proposed early in the 1970s and first established in 1978. Of four recent major sentencing reform approaches-the others being parole guidelines, voluntary sentencing guidelines, and statutory determinate sentences-only sentencing commission systems continue to be created. Despi...
متن کاملMisguided Guidelines: A Critique of Federal Sentencing
underwent a revolutionary but massively flawed revision of its approach to sentencing criminal defendants. Driven by concerns of disparate treatment and undue leniency in punishment, Congress created an independent agency, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, to formulate a new sentencing regime that would drastically limit the discretion of federal judges. The resulting body of law, known as the Se...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012